We asked 4 AI models to recommend the Semantic Scholar pricing. Here's what GPT-4.1, Gemini, Grok, and Llama agree on.
🏆 AI Consensus Winner: Google Scholar — recommended by 2/4 models
🔴 AI Confidence: LOW — no clear winner
AI Consensus
These products were recommended by multiple AI models:
- Google Scholar
- Scopus
- Web of Science
What Each AI Recommends
| Rank | GPT-4.1 | Gemini | Grok | Llama |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Free Basic Access | Semantic Scholar API | Google Scholar | Google Scholar |
| 2 | Academic Premium | Semantic Scholar Dataset | Scopus | Microsoft Academic |
| 3 | Researcher Pro | Semantic Scholar for Institutions | Web of Science | Scopus |
| 4 | Institutional Plan | Semantic Scholar for Publishers | Dimensions | Web of Science |
| 5 | Enterprise Solution | Semantic Scholar Free Access | Elicit | Iris.ai |
Best For Your Needs
- Best overall: Google Scholar
- Best free option: Scopus
- Best for small teams: Web of Science
- Best for enterprises: Microsoft Academic
Methodology
We asked each AI model: "What are the Semantic Scholar Pricing? List your top 5 recommendations."
Models used: GPT-4.1 Nano (OpenAI), Gemini 2.5 Flash (Google), Grok 4.1 Fast (xAI), Llama 4 Scout (Meta). No web search was enabled — these are pure AI opinions based on training data.
The "AI Consensus" shows products mentioned by 2 or more models. The winner is the product that appears most frequently in the #1 position.