We asked 4 AI models to recommend the Semantic Scholar best practices. Here's what GPT-4.1, Gemini, Grok, and Llama agree on.
🏆 AI Consensus Winner: Claim your author page — recommended by 2/4 models
🔴 AI Confidence: LOW — no clear winner
AI Consensus
These products were recommended by multiple AI models:
- Claim your author page
What Each AI Recommends
| Rank | GPT-4.1 | Gemini | Grok | Llama |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clear and concise titles | Claim your author page | Semantic Search Queries | Claim your author page |
| 2 | Use of relevant keywords | Add your publications | TL;DR Summaries | Verify your publications |
| 3 | Properly formatted abstracts | Use the Semantic Scholar API | Citation Graphs | Use a consistent author name |
| 4 | Inclusion of comprehensive references | Integrate with ORCID | Topic Pages | Link your publications to external sources |
| 5 | Consistent keyword tagging | Explore research feeds | Influential Citations | Keep your publication list up-to-date |
Best For Your Needs
- Best overall: Claim your author page
- Best free option: Claim your author page
- Best for small teams: Claim your author page
- Best for enterprises: Claim your author page
Methodology
We asked each AI model: "What are the Semantic Scholar Best Practices? List your top 5 recommendations."
Models used: GPT-4.1 Nano (OpenAI), Gemini 2.5 Flash (Google), Grok 4.1 Fast (xAI), Llama 4 Scout (Meta). No web search was enabled — these are pure AI opinions based on training data.
The "AI Consensus" shows products mentioned by 2 or more models. The winner is the product that appears most frequently in the #1 position.