We asked 4 AI models to recommend the Elicit review. Here's what GPT-4.1, Gemini, Grok, and Llama agree on.
🏆 AI Consensus Winner: Elicit by Ought — recommended by 1/4 models
🔴 AI Confidence: LOW — no clear winner
AI Consensus
These products were recommended by multiple AI models:
- Scite.ai
- Connected Papers
What Each AI Recommends
| Rank | GPT-4.1 | Gemini | Grok | Llama |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Elicit by Ought | Elicit | Consensus | Claude |
| 2 | Elicit (AI research assistant) | Scite.ai | Scite.ai | Llama |
| 3 | Elicit AI tool (by Ought) | Connected Papers | Research Rabbit | ChatGPT |
| 4 | Elicit research platform | ResearchRabbit | Connected Papers | Bard |
| 5 | Elicit knowledge extraction tool | Semantic Scholar | Litmaps | Grok |
Best For Your Needs
- Best overall: Scite.ai
- Best free option: Claude
- Best for small teams: Claude
- Best for enterprises: Scite.ai
Methodology
We asked each AI model: "What are the Elicit Review? List your top 5 recommendations."
Models used: GPT-4.1 Nano (OpenAI), Gemini 2.5 Flash (Google), Grok 4.1 Fast (xAI), Llama 4 Scout (Meta). No web search was enabled — these are pure AI opinions based on training data.
The "AI Consensus" shows products mentioned by 2 or more models. The winner is the product that appears most frequently in the #1 position.