We asked 4 AI models to recommend the Elicit pros and cons. Here's what GPT-4.1, Gemini, Grok, and Llama agree on.
🏆 AI Consensus Winner: Elicit — recommended by 3/4 models
🟡 AI Confidence: MEDIUM
AI Consensus
These products were recommended by multiple AI models:
- Elicit
- Google's Bard
- Connected Papers
- Semantic Scholar
What Each AI Recommends
| Rank | GPT-4.1 | Gemini | Grok | Llama |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Elicit | Elicit | Consensus | Elicit |
| 2 | ChatGPT | Scite | Scite.ai | Lex.page |
| 3 | Google's Bard | Connected Papers | Research Rabbit | Perplexity |
| 4 | Microsoft Bing Chat | ResearchRabbit | Connected Papers | Semantic Scholar |
| 5 | Jasper AI | Semantic Scholar | Semantic Scholar | Google's Bard |
Best For Your Needs
- Best overall: Elicit
- Best free option: ChatGPT
- Best for small teams: ChatGPT
- Best for enterprises: Microsoft Bing Chat
Methodology
We asked each AI model: "What are the Elicit Pros And Cons? List your top 5 recommendations."
Models used: GPT-4.1 Nano (OpenAI), Gemini 2.5 Flash (Google), Grok 4.1 Fast (xAI), Llama 4 Scout (Meta). No web search was enabled — these are pure AI opinions based on training data.
The "AI Consensus" shows products mentioned by 2 or more models. The winner is the product that appears most frequently in the #1 position.