We asked 4 AI models to recommend the Elicit pricing. Here's what GPT-4.1, Gemini, Grok, and Llama agree on.
🏆 AI Consensus Winner: Elicit (by Ought) — recommended by 1/4 models
🔴 AI Confidence: LOW — no clear winner
AI Consensus
These products were recommended by multiple AI models:
- Elicit (by Ought)
- Elicit by Ought (free tier)
- Elicit AI
- Elicit Data Solutions
- Elicit Research Platform
What Each AI Recommends
| Rank | GPT-4.1 | Gemini | Grok | Llama |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Elicit (by Ought) | Free | Consensus | Elicit Discovery |
| 2 | Elicit by Ought (free tier) | Elicit Basic | Scite.ai | Elicit Research Assistant |
| 3 | Elicit AI | Elicit Plus | ResearchRabbit | Elicit Discovery Premium |
| 4 | Elicit Data Solutions | Elicit Premium | Litmaps | Elicit Research Assistant Pro |
| 5 | Elicit Research Platform | Elicit Enterprise | Connected Papers | Elicit Institutional Plan |
Best For Your Needs
- Best overall: Elicit (by Ought)
- Best free option: Elicit by Ought (free tier)
- Best for small teams: Elicit AI
- Best for enterprises: Elicit (by Ought)
Methodology
We asked each AI model: "What are the Elicit Pricing? List your top 5 recommendations."
Models used: GPT-4.1 Nano (OpenAI), Gemini 2.5 Flash (Google), Grok 4.1 Fast (xAI), Llama 4 Scout (Meta). No web search was enabled — these are pure AI opinions based on training data.
The "AI Consensus" shows products mentioned by 2 or more models. The winner is the product that appears most frequently in the #1 position.